With a low frame height, SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA valve:

Image of graphic showing excellent real-world results for continued coronary access

Holds the highest success rate for coronary access*1

Excellent real-world results for continued coronary access

  • 0.1% (n=1324) coronary obstruction after SAPIEN 3 valve implantation5
  • 100% (68/68) success post-TAVR coronary access 1

*Versus self-expandable valve TAVR systems.

Image of graphic showing design to host future valve reinterventions

Best preserves the option for THV-in-THV1-4

Preserving future coronary access is a key consideration in valve-in-valve patients3,4

  • SAPIEN 3 valve-first TAVR reduces risks of future sinus sequestration*4
  • SAPIEN 3 valve-first TAVR facilitates favorable coronary access4

*Risk of sinus sequestration if (1) prior TAV commissure level above STJ and (2) the distance between TAV and STJ was <2.0mm in each coronary sinus.4

THV=transcatheter heart valve.

The only platform optimized for future interventions†1,4

Image of valve

TAV-in-TAV

Image of valve

TAV-in-SAV

Death and Stroke for TAVR with the SAPIEN platform (Native vs Redo)5

Image of chart demonstrating death and stroke outcomes
Image of chart demonstrating death and stroke outcomes

Delivering similar outstanding procedural outcomes§ and experience as the index procedure

For patients assessed at high-risk for surgical valve replacement.
§Reported death and stroke.
There are limited data evaluating safety and efficacy of redo-TAVR.

Achieve outstanding outcomes and sustained valve performance with SAPIEN 3 TAVR. Together, we aim for exceptional.

#Seven-year data from the randomized, controlled PARTNER 3 Trial in low-risk patients and 10-year data from the PARTNER 2 S3i Study in intermediate-risk patients.7,8

Stay connected

Be the first to receive the latest news in transcatheter heart valves, including event announcements.

References:   1. Tarantini G, Nai Fovino L, Scotti A, et al. Coronary access after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with commissural alignment: the ALIGN-ACCESS study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;15(2):e011045. 2. Nai Fovino L, Scotti A, Massussi M, et al. Coronary angiography after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) to evaluate the risk of coronary access impairment after TAVR-in-TAVR. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(13):e016446. 3. De Backer O, Landes U, Fuchs A, et al. Coronary access after TAVR-in-TAVR as evaluated by multidetector computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(21):2528-2538. 4. Ochiai T, Oakley L, Sekhon N, et al. Risk of coronary obstruction due to sinus sequestration in redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(22):2617-2627. 5. Nazif TM, Cahill TJ, Daniels D, et al. Real-world experience with the SAPIEN 3 Ultra transcatheter heart valve: a propensity-matched analysis from the United States. Circ Interventions. 2021;14:e010543. 6. Makkar RR, Kapadia S, Chakravarty T, et al. Outcomes of repeat transcatheter aortic valve replacement with balloon-expandable valves: a registry study. Lancet. 2023;402(10412):1529-1540. 7. Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a balloon-expandable valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(18):1695-1705. 8. Mack MJ, Leon MB. Seven-year outcomes of the PARTNER 3 low-risk trial. Presented at: TCT 2025; San Francisco, CA; October 25-28, 2025. 9. Makkar R. Ten-year outcomes of the PARTNER 2 intermediate-risk studies: a propensity-matched analysis of P2S3i TAVR and P2A surgery. Presented at: TCT 2025; San Francisco, CA; October 25-28, 2025.