The Edwards SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA valve: designed to elevate long-term durability and valve performance

Surgical valves with RESILIA tissue demonstrated significantly improved freedom from structural valve deterioration (SVD) compared to non-RESILIA tissue valves at 8 years4

Freedom from SVD**

Causes of SVD**

RESILIA tissue surgical valves with enhanced calcium-blocking technology had lower rates of stenosis.4

Propensity-matched analysis of the 8-year outcomes of subjects enrolled in the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT MAGNA EASE valve post-approval study (n=258) and the COMMENCE aortic trial (n=689).4

**Standardized definition of SVD was utilized (Akins et al. 2008)
Superiority Test Log-Rank P-Value4

See the Data

Surgical valves with RESILIA tissue showed excellent and consistent outcomes over 7 years2

Prospective, multicenter, single-arm independent clinical events trial2

**Standardized definition of SVD was utilized (Akins et al. 2008)

Icon of the outcome metric of 99.3 percent

SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA valve demonstrated:

REAL-WORLD EVIDENCE FROM 4,500+ PATIENTS5

SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA valve icon

Low Rates of PVL

Multiple arrows icon for outstanding hemodynamics

Outstanding Hemodynamics

Check mark icon for excellent outcomes

Excellent Outcomes

See the Real-World Data

RESILIA tissue is a transformative calcium-blocking technology

RESILIA tissue is the product of over 20 years of research and development and used in the INSPIRIS valve, the #1 implanted surgical valve in the US. RESILIA tissue is a proprietary, stable-capping technology targeting free aldehydes to prevent calcification: the primary driver of SVD for aortic tissue valves.‡2

Watch Video

Clinical data on surgical valves with RESILIA tissue up to 7-year follow-up have been published, with additional follow-up to 10-years in progress.2

Designed to deliver a TAVR experience an implanter can count on

Edwards Commander delivery system

Predictability and control to meet the increasing complexity of your procedures.

Image of delivery system

Edwards eSheath+ introducer set

Low profile and expandable sheath design

Image of sheath technology

§16F & 6.0 mm for 29 mm SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA valve.

Consistently delivering innovation for patient needs

SAPIEN valve technology: the valve design that has revolutionized how we treat severe aortic stenosis today, leveraging decades of Edwards Lifesciences’ surgical valve innovation and expertise.

Edwards SAPIEN 3 platform

Edwards SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA valve

SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA valve

The leading TAVR choice in the U.S.

RESILIA tissue effectively addresses calcification—the #1 cause of tissue valve failure.

*Clinical data on surgical valves with RESILIA tissue up to 7-year follow-up have been published, with additional follow-up to 10-years in progress.2

Image of SAPIEN 3 Ultra valve

SAPIEN 3 Ultra valve

Extended paravalvular leak (PVL) skirt height to reduce occurrences of moderate and mild PVL.3

Image of SAPIEN 3 valve

SAPIEN 3 valve

Proven superior to surgery in low-risk patients at 1 year and equally effective at 5 years.*6,7

Addition of outer [PET] skirt to reduce paravalvular leak PVL, optimized cell size for future coronary access, and introduced a new delivery system for predictable deployment.

*

The PARTNER 3 Trial, SAPIEN 3 transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) proven superior to surgery on the primary endpoint of all-cause death, all stroke, and rehospitalization (valve-related or procedure-related and including heart failure) at 1 year, and multiple pre-specified secondary endpoints in low-risk patients.6,7

PARTNER 3 Trial 5-year Results in Low-Risk Patients - Low rates of cardiovascular mortality through five years (5.5% SAPIEN 3 TAVR to 5.1% SAVR). Low rates of all-cause mortality through five years (10.0% SAPIEN 3 TAVR vs. 8.2% with SAVR). Low rates of disabling stroke through five years (2.9% SAPIEN 3 TAVR to 2.7% SAVR). Low rates of stroke through five years (5.8% SAPIEN 3 TAVR vs. 6.4% SAVR). Low rates of rehospitalization with SAPIEN 3 TAVR through five years (13.7% vs. 17.4%).6,7

Image of SAPIEN XT valve

SAPIEN XT valve

Streamlined to reduce French size and minimize vascular complications.

Image of SAPIEN valve

SAPIEN valve

A life-saving treatment option for inoperable or high-surgical-risk patients.

Achieve outstanding outcomes and sustained valve performance with SAPIEN 3 TAVR. Together, we aim for exceptional.

*Seven-year data from the randomized, controlled PARTNER 3 Trial in low-risk patients, and 10-year data from the PARTNER 2 S3i Study in intermediate-risk patients.10,11

Stay connected

Be the first to receive the latest news in transcatheter heart valves, including event announcements.

References:   1. Flameng W, et al. A randomized assessment of an advanced tissue preservation technology in the juvenile sheep model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015; 149:340-345. 2. Beaver T, Bavaria JE, Griffith B, et al. Seven-year outcomes following aortic valve replacement with a novel tissue bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024;168(3):781-791. 3. Nazif TM, Cahill TJ, Daniels D, et al. Real-world experience with the SAPIEN 3 Ultra transcatheter heart valve: a propensity-matched analysis from the United States. Circ Interventions. 2021;14:e010543. 4. Kaneko T. Propensity-matched 8-year outcomes following aortic valve replacement with novel versus contemporary tissue bioprosthesis. Presented at Heart Valve Society 2025. April 18, 2025, Cairo, Egypt. 5. Kini AS, Gilbert HL, Yaryura R, et al. One-year real-world outcomes of TAVR with the fifth-generation balloon expandable valve in the United States. JACC Cardiovascular Interv. 2025;18(6):785-797. 6. Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a balloon-expandable valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(18):1695-1705. 7. Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients at five years. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(21):1949-1960. 8. De La Fuente AB, Wright GA, Olin JM, et al. Advanced integrity preservation technology reduces bioprosthesis calcification while preserving performance and safety. J Heart Valve Dis. 2015;24(1):101-109. 9. Tod TJ, Dove JS. The association of bound aldehyde content with bioprosthetic tissue calcification. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2016;27(1):8. 10. Mack MJ, Leon MB. Seven-year outcomes of the PARTNER 3 low-risk trial. Presented at: TCT 2025; San Francisco, CA; October 25-28, 2025. 11. Makkar R. Ten-year outcomes of the PARTNER 2 intermediate-risk studies: a propensity-matched analysis of P2S3i TAVR and P2A surgery. Presented at: TCT 2025; San Francisco, CA; October 25-28, 2025. 12. Tarantini G, Nai Fovino L, Scotti A, et al. Coronary access after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with commissural alignment: the ALIGN-ACCESS study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;15(2):e011045. 13. De Backer O, Landes U, Fuchs A, et al. Coronary access after TAVR-in-TAVR as evaluated by multidetector computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(21):2528-2538. 14. Ochiai T, Oakley L, Sekhon N, et al. Risk of coronary obstruction due to sinus sequestration in redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(22):2617-2627. 15. Nai Fovino L, Scotti A, Massussi M, et al. Coronary angiography after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) to evaluate the risk of coronary access impairment after TAVR-in-TAVR. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(13):e016446.